Sunday 27 December 2020

A flame relit - the aeronautical industry in France 1944-1950- Le Fana Special issue - Leduc ramjets




Much has been written and said about the French Air Force in the years immediately before the Second World War, much of it inaccurate. However, whilst the valour of their pilots cannot be underestimated, like many other continental countries France was unprepared for war, and this unpreparedness showed up in the quality and quantity of aircraft available to their air force. The good types that the Armée de l'Air had were not available in sufficient numbers to make any difference, as like many other countries the aviation industry was organised almost on an 'artisan' basis, unable to switch rapidly to full-scale industrial production when the need arose. And political inertia and interference also meant that time and effort was expended on a number of types that were not suitable for their intended purpose. The French government of the day eventually recognised this, and nationalised the aviation industry in 1937; even then, it was not brought under full-scale state control, thus leaving the nation unprepared for the Blitzkrieg of 1940. France was far from atypical in this respect. It is also a fallacy to think that the French aircraft industry had been 'devastated' by German occupation - a notion that rather conveniently draws a veil over the extensive French collaboration that went on with the Germans, especially in the aeronautical field.

Following the defeat and subsequent armistice in June 1940 the Vichy French authorities had very quickly opened negotiations with their new German masters.  On the table was an offer to produce spares for German aircraft manufacturers and establish overhaul and repair facilities for aircraft operating from French territory and in so doing preserve industrial capacity in aviation and preserve employment and some of their manufacturing base in France. In making themselves useful to the Germans, they hoped to avoid all their workers being drafted east to work as 'Auslandarbeiter' in German aircraft factories. This offer was quickly taken up and led to the establishment of so-called Frontbetriebreparatur or FBR plants - advanced overhaul facilities. Junkers set up their FBR at Villacoublay south of Paris. With Ju 88s operating from no fewer than thirty eight aerodromes throughout France at the height of the Battle of Britain the French quickly gained a certain amount of expertise on this particular type. This was 'collaboration', albeit (one suspects and hopes) with a degree of nose-holding and possible tolerance of a degree of sabotage and back-pedalling, in the hope and expectation of better times to come. The Vichy Government thereafter concluded the so-called Wiesbaden Agreement with the Reich to bring the French aircraft industry fully into alignment with German production, with one aircraft or engine out of every three being retained for Vichy, the other two going to Germany. Certain types, such as the Messerschmitt Bf.108, Siebel Si.204 and Fiesler Fi.156 Storch were intended for wholesale transfer of their production to France. And indeed, even the Focke Wulf Fw 190 was intended for this move (and the post-war Armée de l'Air was briefly equipped with home-built Fw 190s, known as the NC.900). While some would argue that the French were not constructing war machines for the Germans, it is nonetheless the case that producing large numbers of transports and seaplanes enabled German industry to concentrate on fighters and other offensive weapons.

As the Germans were expelled from French territory during 1944, determined efforts got underway to re-establish the French aviation industry. As would be the case with other Allied nations, great interest was shown in all manner of weapons systems and aircraft produced by the aircraft manufacturers of the Third Reich. There was another motive for what was to follow - the parlous state of French industry and a total lack of foreign currency naturally led the French to want to seek to exploit the huge quantities of war materiel - spares, parts, tools and jigs - left behind by the retreating Germans. Their factories had produced hundreds of machines for the Germans (both German and French types, eg some 600 Caudron C.445 twins) and they had large stocks of German parts and equipment.

 Thus it was that in 1944, the Liberation saw a French aircraft industry ready to move quickly into full-scale production to help rebuild the economy. And as a member of the Allies, France shared in the uncovering of German high technology aviation - and quickly took advantage of that opportunity to quickly produce home-grown examples of the new and exciting jet aircraft. Most of the German types that the French produced were obsolete. In the meantime their 'German' equipment was cost-effective and usually of reasonable quality. These were the reasons that led to the decision to use the Jumo 213 to power the SO-8000 - the British Griffon was too expensive to be imported. The S.N.C.A.S.O. ejection seat came directly from Heinkel. The Me 208 was due to go into series production in France - it did post-war as the Nord 1100 Noralpha.

However in the immediate post-war environment the French were now much more interested in trying to catch up with the new jet and jet engine technologies in which they lagged way behind. They were soon testing examples of the Me 262, He 162, Me 163 and appropriating German materiel and scientists just as the other powers were doing. It was not long before their own outlandish designs were flying, eg SO 6020, 4000, 6000, SO M2. The Arsenal VB. 10 (below) first flew in July 1945.



 But the French penchant for "interesting" politics meant that this initial surge of innovation was quickly diluted as designers and factories turned out a bewildering variety of weird and wonderful shapes, both piston- and jet-engined. Some were successful; others were not. Some, like the Dassault MD.450 Ouragan, saw series production and service; others, like the Nord 1500 twin-engined torpedo bomber, were less successful - the Nord in part because its torpedo bay was too small for the torpedoes the French had access to at the time...


 This 'special edition' of the French magazine 'La Fana de l'Aviation' tells the story of the six years following liberation and the bewildering variety of aircraft the French industry turned out. In a changing world, the aviation industry everywhere had a hard time keeping up, and France was no exception.

First flight of the Leduc ramjet carried aloft on the SE Languedoc 'mother-ship'







The Leduc ramjet prototype could not take off unassisted (ramjets cannot produce thrust at zero airspeed and thus cannot move an aircraft from a standstill) and was therefore intended to be carried aloft by a parasite aircraft mother ship, such as the four-engined AAS 01A & -B German-origin designs or the French-designed Sud-Est Languedoc four-engined airliners, and released at altitude. Following test flights of the AAS 01/Leduc 0.10 composite, independent unpowered gliding tests began in October 1947. After three such flights, the first powered flight from atop an AAS 01 mother ship was made on 21 April 1949 over Toulouse. Released in a shallow dive at an altitude of 3,050 m (10,010 ft), the engine was tested at half power for twelve minutes, propelling the aircraft to 680 km/h (420 mph).

In subsequent tests, the 0.10 reached a top speed of Mach 0.85 and demonstrated the viability of the ramjet as an aviation powerplant, with a rate of climb of 40 m/s (7,900 ft/min) to 11,000 metres (36,000 ft), exceeding that of the best jet fighters of the time.
Of the two 0.10s originally built, one was destroyed in a crash in 1951 and the other severely damaged in another crash the following year. Both pilots survived with serious injuries.

Generally similar to the 0.10, the Leduc 0.11 featured a Turbomeca Marbore I turbojet on each wingtip, to provide better control during landings. This first flew on 8 February 1951, but was converted back to 0.10 standards (and thereafter referred to as Leduc 010 n°03) a few months later after problems occurred, including misting of the pilot's windows, powerplant synchronization, and wing deflection caused by the turbojets. The engines were replaced by inert mass balances. This aircraft flew 83 test flights and is preserved at Le Bourget.

Tuesday 8 December 2020

Short Sunderland over-flying the Dover Patrol monument at St Margarets at Cliffe - ebay photo find #110

 




Short Sunderland overflying the Dover Patrol monument at St. Margarets at Cliffe, east of Dover. The Dover Patrol Monuments are a trio of war memorials designed by Sir Aston Webb to commemorate the Royal Navy's Dover Patrol of the First World War. Two identical granite memorial obelisks, 75 feet (23 m) high, were erected near Dover and on the Cap Blanc-Nez near Calais in 1921 and 1922. The third obelisk is in New York.

Friday 27 November 2020

Harrier Line Up RAF Wittering 1994 - Ebay photo find # 109

 


An original (probably RAF) photograph of an impressive line up of Harriers at RAF Wittering. Thought to be in 1994 to mark the 25th Anniversary of the Harrier entering service. First in line is GR.1 XV 279 which is part of the Wittering Heritage Museum.




Saturday 14 November 2020

Vidéo from Khmeimim Soviet airbase in Syria

 









Saturday 7 November 2020

Jaguar at Coltishall - ebay photo find #107

 


Photo taken from the tower at RAF Coltishall during 1990 - RAF-Jaguar-Lineup including XZ398




Sunday 18 October 2020

WW I German pilot training school album - ebay photo find #108

 



A selection of Rumpler and Halberstadt training types with rather odd Bestellnummern including C.13/18, C.14/18, C.20/18 (and probably C.9/18 as well. Also some odd biplanes with early Pfalz fins and a Fokker Dr.I and Halberstadt CL.II. Very interesting album indeed.

Saturday 17 October 2020

Phantom FG.1 - R-005 / R-011 RN 892 Squadron, 1977 - ebay photo find #107




Phantom FGR.2 of 19 Sqn, XV430 'C', c1982 - sold for £43




Phantom FG.1 - R-005 / R-011 RN 892 Squadron, 1977

Tuesday 23 June 2020

RN Harrier T.4 on Ian Black Twitter feed








Pakistan International Airlines flight PK 8303 crash -first CCTV images of the 'landing' with gear not deployed



On May 22, 2020, Pakistan International Airlines Flight PK 8303 crashed into a residential area close to Karachi Airport. Nearly 100 people lost their lives. The aircraft on this flight was an Airbus A320, with the registration AP-BLD.



This crash has stimulated the usual debate and speculation. When the full story is known there is a good chance that this accident will prove to be one of the most appalling cases of pilot error ever in a commercial aviation disaster. There have been numerous accidents as a result of blatant pilots' errors, but they were usually part of a chain of events involving one or other external cause (the weather, a technical malfunction of some sort, a difficult approach / terrain). Incredibly - and tragically- it appears that the pilots attempted a landing having omitted to deploy the landing gear after flying in on a 'high and hot' approach - referred to by the professionals as 'unstablized', possibly unaware that their speed exceeded the Airbus limits for lowering the undercarriage on the A320 (VIe speed). Coming in too fast over the threshold the aircraft perhaps 'floated' too far along the runway but when the engines hit the runway and scraped along the ground, the pilots - one of whom had 17,000 hours in his log-book - almost 'instinctively' attempted to lift off and go around. Or perhaps they were simply running out of runway at that stage with no means of slowing or braking. Having damaged the engines, both power plants then failed during the go-around and the aircraft' glided' down at a steep angle of attack into a residential area close to the airport.

but there are so many questions and much speculation;

- how did the flight crew manage to not hear the cacophony of noise being made by the alarms warning that the gear was not deployed.  Complacency ? didn't bother with the check-list? stuck in the 'zone' ?

- why did the tower not warn them about their gear ?

- was this a 'failed' go-around, gear being retracted too late and the sink-rate taking the aircraft onto the tarmac ? This scenario is examined in detail in the second video below.

Juan Browne on the 'blancolirio' youtube channel has some of the best analysis but here you can watch a carefully compiled simulation by 'Captain Mayday' ...a single click to view


Below; first CCTV image screen-shot from "Captain Mayday" video on youtube




The most crucial data sets used in this video are:
- ADS-B Transponder Data from Flight 8303 (source: Flightradar24.com)
- Eyewitness pictures (source: different media)
- ATC transmission of flight PK8303
- Airbus A320 Standard Operating Procedures
- Airbus A320 system and failures simulation
- The simulation is based on the Airbus A320 from FSLabs for Prepar3d







Saturday 20 June 2020

Thursday 18 June 2020

Franco-British commemoration of De Gaulle's 18 June 1940 call to continue resistance - picture of the day



18 June 2020 sees the 80th anniversary of De Gaulle's call to the French who wanted to continue to resist to join him in London where he  had arrived just the previous day, 17 June 1940. London was the capital of the Free French from 1940 to 1944 and today the 'patrouille de France' led the Red Arrows over Les Invalides as part of the commemorations. French President Macron awarded the city of London France's highest decoration, la Légion d'honneur.








Sunday 3 May 2020

BREDA-ZAPPATA B.Z.308 airline from 1948 -ebay photo find #104


BREDA-ZAPPATA B.Z.308 four-engine prototype airline of 1948




The B.Z.308 was a four-engined civil transport developed in the late 1940s for operation over both European and transatlantic routes. A large low-wing monoplane of all-metal construction, it was powered by four Bristol Centaurus radial engines driving five-bladed propellers. It had a large tailplane with endplate fins and rudders, and had retractable landing gear. The fuselage, oval in cross-section, accommodated a flight crew of five and 55 passengers in two cabins; a high-density model was planned with seats for 80. Construction began during 1946, under aircraft designer Filippo Zappata at Breda's Sesto San Giovanni works. The Allied Commission halted the work, which was not resumed until January 1947. Further delays in the delivery of Bristol Centaurus engines delayed the first flight, which was on 27 August 1948, piloted by Mario Stoppani. Although flight testing went well, the project was abandoned as a result of financial problems, anticipated competition from American airliners in the postwar market, and pressure (under the Marshall plan) to close down Breda's aeronautical section. Breda subsequently stopped producing aircraft entirely.

Monday 20 April 2020

More 57 Sqn Victors - ebay photo find #103



57 Sqn, Handley Page Victor K.2, XL 160 and 27 Sqn Tornado



57-Sqn-Handley-Page-Victor-K-2-XL 164-at-RAF-Marham



57 Sqn, Victor K.2, XH672 with  two Tornado GR.1s  (27 and 617 Sqns)



on offer here